-
1 deep semantics
-
2 deep semantics
-
3 deep semantics
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > deep semantics
-
4 deep
1. n глубь, глубина2. n углубление, впадина; глубокое место3. n абиссальные глубины4. n поэт. море, океан; пучина5. n книжн. бездна, пропасть6. n поэт. ритор. непостижимое, вечная тайна7. n мор. расстояние между двумя отметками лотлиня8. n горн. уклон, наклонная выработка9. a глубокий10. a имеющий определённую глубину, глубиной в11. a широкий; имеющий большую толщину12. a находящийся на большой глубине, глубинный13. a покрытый толстым слоем, находящийся подlanes deep in snow — дорожки, засыпанные толстым слоем снега
14. a находящийся или расположенный в глубине, далеко отa house deep in the valley — домик, стоящий глубоко в долине
15. a погружённый, увлечённый, поглощённый16. a сильный, крепкийdeep in the chest — широкогрудый, с широкой грудью
to be deep in debt — сильно задолжать, быть кругом в долгу
17. a серьёзный, глубокий, фундаментальный, основательный18. a сложный; непостижимый; таинственный19. a сложный; глубинный20. a интенсивный; сильный, глубокийdeep plough — плуг для глубокой пахоты, плантажный плуг
21. a полный, совершенный, абсолютный22. a глубоко укоренившийся; заядлый, завзятый23. a тяжёлый; серьёзный; мучительный24. a насыщенный, тёмный, густой25. a низкий, полный, грудного тембраa deep, resonant voice — низкий, звучный голос
26. a разг. хитрый, ловкий27. a мед. подкожный28. a психол. подсознательный29. a как компонент сложных слов30. a стоящий в столько-то рядов31. a погрузившийся на столько-то32. adv глубоко; в глубинеdeep pocket theory — «доктрина глубокого кармана»
33. adv на большом удаленииdeep in the mountains — высоко в горах;
34. adv до момента наиболее полного проявления35. adv очень, весьма; сильно, многоСинонимический ряд:1. bass (adj.) bass; low pitched; low toned; low-pitched; resonant; sonorous2. bottomless (adj.) bottomless; immeasurable3. buried (adj.) buried; deep-seated; inmost4. difficult (adj.) abstract; acute; difficult; incisive; rich5. intensive (adj.) abstruse; abysmal; blood-and-guts; complex; hard; intensive; profound6. intent (adj.) absorbed; consumed; engaged; engrossed; immersed; intent; preoccupied; rapt; wrapped; wrapped up7. involved (adj.) absorbing; earnest; extreme; fast; great; heartfelt; intimate; involved8. low (adj.) below; beneath; low; subterranean9. recondite (adj.) acroamatic; esoteric; heavy; hermetic; occult; orphic; recondite; secret10. serious (adj.) grave; grievous; serious11. sly (adj.) crafty; foxy; guileful; insidious; sly; subdolous; subtle; tricky; vulpine; wily12. strong (adj.) deep-felt; intense; strong13. wise (adj.) artful; astute; bright; cunning; designing; discerning; intelligent; penetrating; wise14. ocean (noun) abyss; blue; brine; drink; main; ocean; river; seaАнтонимический ряд:familiar; flighty; frivolous; high; ignorant; shallow; simple; superficial -
5 denotational semantics
-
6 general semantics
-
7 inheritance semantics
-
8 operational semantics
-
9 глубинный семантика
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > глубинный семантика
-
10 Grammar
I think that the failure to offer a precise account of the notion "grammar" is not just a superficial defect in linguistic theory that can be remedied by adding one more definition. It seems to me that until this notion is clarified, no part of linguistic theory can achieve anything like a satisfactory development.... I have been discussing a grammar of a particular language here as analogous to a particular scientific theory, dealing with its subject matter (the set of sentences of this language) much as embryology or physics deals with its subject matter. (Chomsky, 1964, p. 213)Obviously, every speaker of a language has mastered and internalized a generative grammar that expresses his knowledge of his language. This is not to say that he is aware of the rules of grammar or even that he can become aware of them, or that his statements about his intuitive knowledge of his language are necessarily accurate. (Chomsky, 1965, p. 8)Much effort has been devoted to showing that the class of possible transformations can be substantially reduced without loss of descriptive power through the discovery of quite general conditions that all such rules and the representations they operate on and form must meet.... [The] transformational rules, at least for a substantial core grammar, can be reduced to the single rule, "Move alpha" (that is, "move any category anywhere"). (Mehler, Walker & Garrett, 1982, p. 21)4) The Relationship of Transformational Grammar to Semantics and to Human Performancehe implications of assuming a semantic memory for what we might call "generative psycholinguistics" are: that dichotomous judgments of semantic well-formedness versus anomaly are not essential or inherent to language performance; that the transformational component of a grammar is the part most relevant to performance models; that a generative grammar's role should be viewed as restricted to language production, whereas sentence understanding should be treated as a problem of extracting a cognitive representation of a text's message; that until some theoretical notion of cognitive representation is incorporated into linguistic conceptions, they are unlikely to provide either powerful language-processing programs or psychologically relevant theories.Although these implications conflict with the way others have viewed the relationship of transformational grammars to semantics and to human performance, they do not eliminate the importance of such grammars to psychologists, an importance stressed in, and indeed largely created by, the work of Chomsky. It is precisely because of a growing interdependence between such linguistic theory and psychological performance models that their relationship needs to be clarified. (Quillian, 1968, p. 260)here are some terminological distinctions that are crucial to explain, or else confusions can easily arise. In the formal study of grammar, a language is defined as a set of sentences, possibly infinite, where each sentence is a string of symbols or words. One can think of each sentence as having several representations linked together: one for its sound pattern, one for its meaning, one for the string of words constituting it, possibly others for other data structures such as the "surface structure" and "deep structure" that are held to mediate the mapping between sound and meaning. Because no finite system can store an infinite number of sentences, and because humans in particular are clearly not pullstring dolls that emit sentences from a finite stored list, one must explain human language abilities by imputing to them a grammar, which in the technical sense is a finite rule system, or programme, or circuit design, capable of generating and recognizing the sentences of a particular language. This "mental grammar" or "psychogrammar" is the neural system that allows us to speak and understand the possible word sequences of our native tongue. A grammar for a specific language is obviously acquired by a human during childhood, but there must be neural circuitry that actually carries out the acquisition process in the child, and this circuitry may be called the language faculty or language acquisition device. An important part of the language faculty is universal grammar, an implementation of a set of principles or constraints that govern the possible form of any human grammar. (Pinker, 1996, p. 263)A grammar of language L is essentially a theory of L. Any scientific theory is based on a finite number of observations, and it seeks to relate the observed phenomena and to predict new phenomena by constructing general laws in terms of hypothetical constructs.... Similarly a grammar of English is based on a finite corpus of utterances (observations), and it will contain certain grammatical rules (laws) stated in terms of the particular phonemes, phrases, etc., of English (hypothetical constructs). These rules express structural relations among the sentences of the corpus and the infinite number of sentences generated by the grammar beyond the corpus (predictions). (Chomsky, 1957, p. 49)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Grammar
См. также в других словарях:
semantics — semanticist /si man teuh sist/, semantician /see man tish euhn/, n. /si man tiks/, n. (used with a sing. v.) 1. Ling. a. the study of meaning. b. the study of linguistic development by classifying and examining changes in meaning and form. 2.… … Universalium
Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules — The Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) is an adopted standard of the Object Management Group (OMG) intended to be the basis for a formal and detailed natural language declarative description of a complex entity, such as a… … Wikipedia
Deep structure — In linguistics, specifically in the study of syntax in the tradition of generative grammar (also known as transformational grammar), the deep structure of a linguistic expression is a theoretical construct that seeks to unify several related… … Wikipedia
Generative semantics — is (or perhaps was) a research program within linguistics, initiated by the work of various early students of Noam Chomsky: John R. Ross, Paul Postal and later James McCawley. George Lakoff was also instrumental in developing and advocating the… … Wikipedia
Theory-based semantics — is a phrase used by Richard L. Ballard to describe knowledge representations that are based on the premise that the binding element of human thought is theory, and that theory constrains the meaning of concepts, ideas and thought patterns… … Wikipedia
generative semantics — noun plural but usually singular in construction : a description of a language emphasizing a semantic deep structure that is logical in form, that provides syntactic structure, and that is related to surface structure by transformations * * *… … Useful english dictionary
generative semantics — noun plural but usually singular in construction Date: 1970 a description of a language emphasizing a semantic deep structure that is logical in form, that provides syntactic structure, and that is related to surface structure by transformations … New Collegiate Dictionary
generative semantics — Ling. a theory of generative grammar holding that the deep structure of a sentence is equivalent to its semantic representation, from which the surface structure can then be derived using only one set of rules that relate underlying meaning and… … Universalium
generative semantics — gen′erative seman′tics n. ling. a theory of grammar holding that the deep structure of a sentence is equivalent to its semantic representation, from which the surface structure can be derived using one set of rules rather than separate semantic… … From formal English to slang
linguistics — /ling gwis tiks/, n. (used with a sing. v.) the science of language, including phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and historical linguistics. [1850 55; see LINGUISTIC, ICS] * * * Study of the nature and structure of… … Universalium
HEBREW GRAMMAR — The following entry is divided into two sections: an Introduction for the non specialist and (II) a detailed survey. [i] HEBREW GRAMMAR: AN INTRODUCTION There are four main phases in the history of the Hebrew language: the biblical or classical,… … Encyclopedia of Judaism
